Civil Rights & Constitutional Law
Huron mayor orders police seize local activist as she speaks before council about officials’...
May 15, 2019
Wednesday, June 24, 2020
Huron, OH – Today—over 13 months after the ordeal of First Amendment retaliation and malicious prosecution of civic activist Stacy Hinners began—the City of Huron’s new law director, Todd Schrader, fired Michael Joseph O’Shea—the so-called “special” prosecutor hired to prosecute Mrs. Hinners over her speech to the City Council on May 14, 2019 criticizing Open Meetings Act violations. O'Shea's firing came in response to a formal written taxpayer demand by City of Huron civic activists Stacey Hartley; Michele Schuster; Brandon and Elisabeth Kenning; John and Cheryl Zimmerman; and Charles and Charlene Baron that the City do so.
“Mr. O’Shea’s services as special prosecutor in that matter have been terminated, effective immediately. There are no charges pending against Ms. Hinners, and the City has no present plans to seek any criminal charges arising out of those events, or to retain Mr. O'Shea in relation to any.”
The May 8, 2020 taxpayer demand letter discussed a myriad of reasons that Michael J. O’Shea’s appointment and prosecution activity were illegal. It also noted that “O’Shea failed to take the oath to “support the Constitution of the United States” required by Ohio law.
Ohio statute R.C. 733.56 requires a community’s law director to seek an injunction to “restrain the misapplication of funds of the municipal corporation, the abuse of its corporate powers, or the execution or performance of any contract made in behalf of the municipal corporation in contravention of the laws or ordinance[s] governing it, or which was procured by fraud or corruption.”
The failure to do so upon demand empowers taxpayers with the authority to file suit in the City’s name, under R.C. 733.59.
Although Huron’s firing of O’Shea resolves one main aspect of the taxpayers’ concerns, it did not address the issue of recoupment of Huron taxpayer funds improperly spent on O’Shea. Attorney Subodh Chandra pointed this out in a response to Schrader, but received no reply.
Absent resolution, under Ohio law, the taxpayers are free to bring suit in the City of Huron’s name to recover the funds misspent on O’Shea.
Subodh Chandra and Brian Bardwell also represent Mrs. Hinners in the defense of the First Amendment–retaliatory criminal prosecution over Mrs. Hinners’s May 14, 2019 speech, which resulted in a dismissal that O’Shea was free to refile, and in in her and her husband Jason HInners's civil-rights lawsuit against O’Shea, the City, and other current and former Huron officials including former Mayor Brad Hartung and Councilman Glen Ginesi.
Chandra said, "Now that O'Shea at long last has been fired, thanks to new City leadership, the next step in the retaliatory criminal matter is for us to ask the Huron Municipal Court to convert the dismissal of the First Amendment–retaliatory charges against Mrs. Hinners into a permanent one, known as 'dismissal with prejudice.' The City should have taken care of this itself—but we will."
The conduct of Huron officials including former Mayor Brad Hartung and former Councilman Glen Ginesi against Mrs. Hinners and her husband Jason Hinners remains under criminal investigation by the Ohio attorney general’s office.
Chandra Law has had a series of successes in taxpayer demands and taxpayer litigation in Ohio.
The Chandra Law Firm LLC is solely responsible for the content of this website.
©2020 The Chandra Law Firm LLC.