Chandra Law Logo

U.S. Supreme Court clarifies statute of limitations in False Claims Act cases: Cochise Consultancy, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Hunt

Wednesday, June 26, 2019

The U.S. Supreme Court recently considered time limitations on actions for defrauding the federal government. Under the False Claims Act, the government or a private party may sue an individual for submitting a false claim to the federal government. 31 U.S.C. 3729(a)(1). The statute requires a claim be filed within six years of the incident, or three years of a government official learning of the incident. No claim can be filed ten years after the incident occurred. 31 U.S.C. 3731(b).

In Cochise Consultancy, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Hunt, 139 S.Ct. 1507 (2019), the Court considered whether the limitation is impacted by the government intervening as a party in the lawsuit, and whether a private relator is considered a government official.

The Court first concluded that the statute provides the same amount of time to bring an action regardless of whether the government intervenes. Justice Thomas explained that the plain text of the statute does not lend itself to different interpretations. Id at 1513. The text states clearly that a claim must be filed within six years of the incident, or three years of when a government official knew or should have known of the incident, whichever is later. The Court declines investigation beyond the plain meaning of the text, absent ambiguity. Id.

The Court then rebuffs Petitioner’s argument that the applicable limitation is three years, because a private relator qualifies as a government official within the meaning of § 3731(b)(2). A relator cannot become an employee or appointee of the federal government by filing a civil action. Id at 1514. The statute’s use of “the official charged with responsibility to act” indicates that specific officers are contemplated by the statute, not any relator. Id (emphasis added).

The Court affirmed the Eleventh Circuit’s judgment. The Court concluded that the government’s intervention does not impact the time a party has to bring an action under and that, for purposes of the False Claims Act, a private relator is not considered a government official.

Got fraud? Call The Chandra Law Firm LLC today.

Our Cleveland-based boutique litigation firm provides large-firm skills, experience, and resources with small-firm personal attention to your case's unique needs and goals. It is why clients throughout Ohio and across the United States have turned to our attorneys to handle False Claims Act cases.

You can reach our firm, which serves clients throughout Ohio and the nation, by calling 216-578-1700 or by filling out our online contact form.

One of our intake specialists will take detailed information for attorney review. They are highly trained at obtaining the information needed to evaluate your case.

At Chandra Law, your case is our cause.®

Related Practice Areas
False Claims Act (Qui Tams)Government ethics, misconduct, fraud, & abuseHealthcare fraudMortgage fraudTax fraudWhistleblower actions (False Claims Act)
Tags
got-fraudfalse-claims-actstatute-of-limitationshealthcare-fraud

Making the right choice in legal representation can make the difference in whether you achieve a result that protects your legal rights and best interests.

Tell Us About Your Case