Chandra Law Logo

What can crime victims obtain from the criminal-justice system versus the civil-justice system?

Criminal cases, which are brought in the name of state and not individual victims, aim to punish the offender and protect the public. Punishment can happen in the forms of incarceration, probation, or criminal fines (that go to the state, not the victims).

By contrast, civil cases aim to financially compensate victims for the harm and hold wrongdoers financially accountable. They also aim to punish and deter certain types of malicious conduct with financial penalties called punitive damages. In civil cases, also, victims may be able to obtain what is called “injunctive relief.” That just means an order to stop doing something, at risk of the penalty of contempt of court (which can include imprisonment or fines).

After a perpetrator’s criminal conviction, the judge may order restitution—usually for victims’ provable out-of-pocket costs (medical bills, counseling, lost wages, and sometimes, attorney fees). There, victims can’t get broader money damages for all the harm—including even severe, debilitating emotional distress or future psychiatric or psychological-therapy care.

That often leaves victims without being made fully whole.

In civil cases, victims may seek damages for emotional distress, pain and suffering, reputational harm, and more—relief the criminal system just doesn’t offer or provide.

Victims can also better control their cases in civil court and determine how much is enough for a settlement; in criminal court, the prosecutor controls what they are seeking and a jury, judge, or both decide it. Victims have almost no control over the plea-bargaining process, other than (in some states) being heard.

The prosecutor doesn’t have to follow a victim’s wishes—even reasonable ones.


What are the core differences between criminal justice and civil justice?

  • Purpose

    • Criminal: Punish lawbreaking and deter future crimes.

    • Civil: Make victims whole (as best as can be done) and shift the cost of harm to the wrongdoer (and sometimes their employers or insurers). And obtain an order to stop, if that’s possible in the particular case.

  • Who’s in charge

    • Criminal: The prosecutor—not the victim—decides charges, strategy, whether to accept a plea (and what type of plea), and what sentence to recommend (including the amount of restitution).

    • Civil: Victims and their lawyer call many of the shots: what claims to bring, whether to settle, and on what terms.

  • Standards of proof

    • Criminal: Beyond a reasonable doubt (the highest, most difficult standard under the law).

    • Civil: Usually preponderance of the evidence (more likely than not). Some claims or remedies (like punitive damages) may require clear-and-convincing proof.

  • Outcomes

    • Criminal: Conviction can lead to jail, probation, fines to the state, and restitution to victims for proven, hard economic losses—but not for even severe emotional or reputational harm.

    • Civil: Money damages (economic and noneconomic), punitive damages for malicious conduct, injunctions (court orders to stop misconduct or change policies), and, where statutes permit, attorney-fee awards.

What is “restitution” in criminal cases?

Restitution is a court order that the offender repay victims’ direct financial losses caused by the crime, like medical expenses, therapy bills, lost wages, and damaged property.


But there are important limits:

  • Restitution is typically confined to documented, out-of-pocket losses.

  • Restitution doesn’t cover emotional distress, pain and suffering, reputational harm, future, unknown therapeutic expenses, or broader life impacts.

  • Collection can be slow or incomplete if the offender lacks resources. Collection is in the hands of the state, which might not do a good job.

Some states also have victim-compensation funds for limited costs. Those are helpful—but they are no substitute for full civil damages.


What can a civil lawsuit provide that criminal court cannot?

Civil law lets victims pursue the full measure of their losses and, where authorized, additional remedies:

  • Economic damages: medical and therapy expenses (past/future), lost income, lost earning capacity, out-of-pocket costs.

  • Noneconomic damages: emotional distress, pain and suffering, humiliation, loss of enjoyment of life, reputational harm.

  • Punitive damages: where the conduct was malicious, oppressive, in bad faith, or in reckless disregard of victims’ rights (the exact standards vary by state).

  • Injunctive relief: court orders requiring policy changes, training, supervision, or to stop intimidation or harassment.

  • Attorney fees and costs when statutes allow (examples including many federal civil-rights laws like Section 1983 and employment laws like Title VII).

Who controls each case—and why does that matter?

  • Criminal: Victims are obviously key witnesses, but the state is the “client.” Prosecutors decide whether to file charges, which charges, whether to dismiss, whether to accept a plea, and what sentence they want to pursue. Judges control the sentencing. Victims may give input (including a victim-impact statement), but they don’t direct the case.

  • Civil: victims are the clients. Victims and their lawyers decide what claims to file, which defendants to sue (including employers for negligent hiring, training, supervision, or retention, or for vicarious liability), whether to settle, and for how much to settle. Within reason, victims can insist on accountability that matches the harm, not just what fits a prosecutor’s idea of a good plea deal.

How do these differences affect survivors of sexual harassment and sexual assault?

Consider two examples:

Sexual assault or rape

  • Criminal: If the prosecutor secures a conviction, the court may order restitution for economic losses—therapy, medical care, lost wages. But the criminal court won’t award damages for emotional distress, trauma, or reputational harm. For sexual-harassment and sexual-assault survivors, those latter harms are usually the greatest. Victims may have very little in terms of hard, money damages but severe post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) that lasts the rest of their lives.

  • Civil: Victims may sue the perpetrator—and sometimes institutions that enabled the assault—for both economic and noneconomic damages, and seek punitive damages where the law allows. Victims may also seek protective orders or injunctions to prevent further contact or to require institutional reforms.

Workplace sexual harassment

  • Criminal: Harassment itself usually isn’t charged as a crime unless it crosses certain lines. Related crimes (like sexual assault, gross sexual imposition, rape, battery, stalking, menacing) may be. Even then, restitution covers only out-of-pocket costs.

  • Civil: Victims may bring claims under employment and civil-rights laws (and related torts). Civil remedies can include back pay, front pay, emotional-distress damages, punitive damages (where permitted), and injunctive relief requiring an employer to stop the harassment and fix its policies.

The bottom line is that criminal cases can provide helpful affirmation of victims’ lived experiences and provide protection and limited financial repair; but civil cases are useful to seek complete compensation and better control the path forward.


Do I need a criminal conviction to win a civil case?

No.

The standards are different. Victims can win civil cases even when there’s no arrest, no charges, or even an acquittal, because civil claims require a lower burden of proof.

A criminal conviction, if it exists, can help—but it’s generally not required for civil recovery.


May I pursue criminal and civil cases at the same time?

Often, yes. They are separate tracks. But coordination matters:

  • Filing a civil case too early can complicate the criminal investigation. But sometimes doing so can yield valuable.

  • Waiting too long can risk missing statutes of limitations for civil claims.

  • A skilled civil-rights lawyer that is also an experienced former federal prosecutor (like our managing partner Subodh Chandra) can coordinate, help, and strategize with prosecutors to protect both cases and victims’ interests. You can see one of many examples of where we did this for a sexual-harassment victim here (criminal remedy for our client) after we fought for it, and here (parallel civil suit for the same client).

Will my identity and privacy be protected?

Options vary by state and court:

  • Many courts allow protective orders that limit who can view sensitive information.

  • Some jurisdictions (like Ohio and California) allow survivors of sexual assault to sue under pseudonyms.

  • Criminal cases may have victim-privacy protections by statute.
    Ask your lawyer about the best strategy for your situation.

How long will this take—and how will fees work?

Timelines vary. Criminal cases proceed on the state’s schedule. Civil cases depend on the court’s docket and the complexity of your claims.

As for fees, many civil-rights and injury cases are handled on a contingency fee—you pay no attorney fees unless there’s a recovery. In some statutes, a fee-shifting provision can make the defendant pay your reasonable fees if you win.

For crime-victims’ advocacy, we may do the work on a flat fee, hourly fee, or bundled in to our advocacy work on a contingency-fee criminal case. It all depends on how much work will be required.


What should I do now?

  • Preserve evidence: texts, emails, direct messages (DMs), photos, medical and counseling records, human-resources reports and investigations, and witness names and contact information.

  • Write a detailed timeline and chronology while events are still fresh in your mind with notes about what evidence (documentary or testimonial) might support your contention about what happened on each date.

  • Get the medical and counseling care you need.

  • Talk to a lawyer quickly to protect deadlines and plan the best path—criminal, civil, or both.

We can help.

Chandra Law represents survivors of sexual harassment, sexual assault, and other serious misconduct in civil cases—and we advocate and coordinate for crime victims when there is or should be a criminal investigation and case.

We focus on protecting your dignity, maximizing your recovery, and holding wrongdoers accountable.

Please contact us with details through our secure contact form to discuss your options confidentially. It is best to open with one or two sentences describing the nature of your claim and when the events happened (so we can spot the statute of limitations), and then lay out the chronology and evidence supporting your claim. Those that don’t do this risk delaying a response. The more information you can provide while still leading with the bottom line up top, the more effective your pitch will be.


Related Practice Areas
Constitutional LawDefamation (Libel and Slander)Employment DiscriminationEmployment RetaliationFirst AmendmentGovernment Ethics, Misconduct, Fraud, & AbuseInternal InvestigationsSexual HarassmentWhistleblower Actions (False Claims Act)Wrongful DeathTitle IXRace DiscriminationSex/gender DiscriminationPregnancy DiscriminationMalicious Prosecution, Abuse of Process, and False ArrestHazingWrongful TerminationConstructive DischargeHostile Work EnvironmentCrime Victims: Civil Action for Damages for Criminal Acts Under Ohio Revised Code § 2307.60Revenge PornPrivate-citizen-initiated criminal charges in OhioWhistleblower Program of the U.S. Department of JusticeFirst Amendment RetaliationCalifornia's Bane Act: Protecting Your Civil Rights from Threats and CoercionCalifornia’s Unruh Civil Rights Act: Your Right to Equal Treatment in Public PlacesTitle VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964: Federal Protection Against Employment DiscriminationSection 1983 Litigation: Holding Government Officials Accountable for Constitutional ViolationsOhio Whistleblower Protection ActFree Speech for California Public Employees: Where the Line Is DrawnSexual Harassment at Work in California: Your RightsCrisis Management and Communications—and Reputation DefenseCalifornia’s Anti-SLAPP StatuteOhio’s Anti-SLAPP StatuteCivil action in Ohio for dissemination of private images

Making the right choice in legal representation can make the difference in whether you achieve a result that protects your legal rights and best interests.

Tell Us About Your Case