Civil Rights & Constitutional Law
Federal voting-rights trial challenging election laws that are resulting in thousands of Ohio...
March 16, 2016
Saturday, October 29, 2016
In Episode 52 of Slate's Amicus with Dahlia Lithwick podcast, Subodh Chandra discusses the 2013 Supreme Court 2013 case Shelby County v. Holder.
In that case, the Court ruled 5–4 that Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act was unconstitutional. After that ruling, multiple states amended their voting laws in ways that disproportionately targeted and harmed minority voters. This week, Chandra Law attorneys led by Subodh Chandra and Stanford Law Professor Pamela Karlan filed an emergency motion with the Supreme Court, asking for a suspension of post-Shelby voting restrictions in Ohio.
AUDIO:
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2016/10/will-trump-supporters-try-to-intimidate-minority-voters-on-election-day.html
TRANSCRIPT: http://www.slate.com/articles/podcasts/amicus/2016/11/voter_fraud_and_shelby_county_v_holder_on_slate_s_amicus_podcast.html
The Chandra Law Firm LLC is solely responsible for the content of this website.
©2024 The Chandra Law Firm LLC.
“This law firm communicates extremely well. This law firm is professional. I would recommend this law firm to my family and friends. I appreciate your service. Thank you.”
— Shunnah Tyler
“You were very professional, courteous, and caring. I felt secure with the information shared and felt you had our best interest at heart. Thank you!”
— Chivonna Childs
“Excellent and caring service. I was more than pleased that my case was humanized so that it was addressed properly.”
— Nicole R.
“The team was awesome! ”
— Danielle Nelson
