Chandra Law Logo

Subodh Chandra interviewed on voting rights by Slate Supreme Court reporter Dahlia Lithwick

Saturday, October 29, 2016

In Slate's Amicus with Dahlia Lithwick podcast, Subodh Chandra discusses his voting-rights litigation in Ohio to stop Republican efforts to suppress the vote.

In Episode 52 of Slate's Amicus with Dahlia Lithwick podcast, Subodh Chandra discusses the 2013 Supreme Court 2013 case Shelby County v. Holder.

In that case, the Court ruled 5­–4 that Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act was unconstitutional. After that ruling, multiple states amended their voting laws in ways that disproportionately targeted and harmed minority voters. This week, Chandra Law attorneys led by Subodh Chandra and Stanford Law Professor Pamela Karlan filed an emergency motion with the Supreme Court, asking for a suspension of post-Shelby voting restrictions in Ohio.

AUDIO:

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2016/10/will-trump-supporters-try-to-intimidate-minority-voters-on-election-day.html

TRANSCRIPT: http://www.slate.com/articles/podcasts/amicus/2016/11/voter_fraud_and_shelby_county_v_holder_on_slate_s_amicus_podcast.html

Related Practice Areas
Constitutional lawVoting rights
Tags
voting-rightsconstitutional-litigationconstitutional-rightsconstitutional-law

Making the right choice in legal representation can make the difference in whether you achieve a result that protects your legal rights and best interests.

Tell Us About Your Case