Chandra Law Logo

North Royalton police officer sues city officials for demoting and disciplining her after she helped expose alleged tampering and corruption

Wednesday, July 1, 2026

Sgt. FloAnn Rybicki alleges she faced retaliation and intimidation by the mayor and police chief because she was a witness to crimes by the chief and a lieutenant.

North Royalton police officer sues city officials for demoting and disciplining her after she helped expose alleged tampering and corruption

North Royalty Police Chief Keith Tarase and former Mayor Lawrence “Larry” Antoskiewicsz: accused of retaliatory criminal acts against a police sergeant witness, in a cover-up scheme.

Cleveland, OHToday, veteran North Royalton police officer FloAnn Rybicki filed a civil-rights lawsuit in the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas against former Mayor Lawrence “Larry” Antoskiewicsz and Police Chief Keith Tarase. The lawsuit alleges that North Royalton city officials orchestrated a severe campaign of retaliation, pay cuts, and professional humiliation to cover up felony records tampering by the city’s police chief and a lieutenant to protect another police officer.

The arrest of a deputy chief who was intoxicated while driving and alleged felony record tampering

According to the complaint, the controversy began late on October 11, 2025, when North Royalton Patrolman Spencer Lowe arrested highly intoxicated Orange Village Deputy Police Chief Patrick O’Callahan. O’Callahan drove while impaired—a crime of which he has since been convicted—with, according to body-camera footage, three loaded firearms on his person and in his vehicle’s center console and back seat. Officer Lowe charged O’Callahan with operating a vehicle while impaired (OVI) and felony improper firearm handling.

The complaint notes that O’Callahan unethically attempted to leverage his badge and name-drop to escape accountability, but Officer Lowe maintained his professional integrity.

The suit alleges that on October 14, 2025, Chief Tarase and Lt. James Cutler accessed the department’s electronic-records system and deleted the felony firearm charge from Officer Lowe’s approved public-record arrest report. The complaint alleges that the command staff violated the department’s own record-modification policies and deleted this charge, to protect a fellow high-ranking police officer from felony prosecution and public scrutiny.

Pathbreaking police sergeant alleged to have witnesses crimes

Sgt. Rybicki, a 29-year veteran and North Royalton’s first female officer, discovered the alteration while she was reviewing patrol videos and data logs. She was now a witness to crimes, the suit contends. At Officer Lowe’s request, she printed a copy of the electronic-audit trail showing that the chief and lieutenant had secretly purged the felony charge. Officer Lowe later used those records to file an internal whistleblower report with Mayor Antoskiewicz and formal complaints with the Cuyahoga County Prosecutor’s Office, the Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation (BCI), and the FBI.

After Antoskiewicz and Tarse fired him, Officer Lowe filed a lawsuit of his own, alleging the city and its officials engaged in First Amendment retaliation. The Chandra Law Firm filed that suit, which has been removed to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, before Judge Patricia Ann Gaughan.

Pretextual investigations and weaponized retaliation

Rather than hold Chief Tarase and Lt. Cutler accountable for what the complaint describes as felonious tampering, city leaders allegedly weaponized internal procedures to crush witness Sgt. Rybicki and reporting Officer Lowe. Mayor Antoskiewicz closed the investigation into the command staff without discipline. The complaint alleges that instead, the mayor ordered a retaliatory, sham internal investigation targeting Officer Lowe and Sgt. Rybicki for the “improper release” of records.

The complaint details that internal investigators admitted they found no evidence that Sgt. Rybicki or Officer Lowe leaked any records to the news media. Still, on April 14, 2026, the city demoted Sgt. Rybicki from sergeant to a road-patrol officer, slashed her pay, and banned her for two years from seeking a promotion. The suit alleges that this two-year ban directly benefits the very internal-affairs officers and command staff involved in the cover-up, who also vie for the chief position given Tarase’s expected retirement. Sgt. Rybicki would likely have been chief.

The complaint further alleges that Chief Tarase engaged in a calculated campaign of petty, hostile acts designed to humiliate Sgt. Rybicki. These acts allegedly include:

  • Falsely photoshopping her sergeant’s bars off her new identity badge.

  • Forcing her to take a badge number previously assigned to a retired officer whom department members widely mocked for being chronically overweight.

  • Fabricating bogus reprimands, like writing her up for dropping off a gift at a colleague’s authorized going-away gathering.

Sgt. Rybicki’s claims for damages under R.C. 2307.60

Sgt. Rybicki brings her suit under Ohio Revised Code § 2307.60, which authorizes civil actions for damages for anyone injured by criminal acts. The complaint alleges that the defendants’ actions constitute explicit criminal statutory violations, including:

  • Witness Intimidation (R.C. 2921.04(A)): The suit alleges that the defendants knowingly launched sham investigations, demoted Sgt. Rybicki, and slashed her pay to intimidate and hinder her because she was a key witness to the command staff’s corrupt and illegal records tampering.

  • Retaliation (R.C. 2921.05(A)): The complaint alleges that city officials purposefully targeted Sgt. Rybicki’s livelihood, salary, and future expected retirement pension because she discharged her duties and acted as a witness to public-record tampering.

  • Falsification (R.C. 2921.13(A)(2) & (3)): The suit asserts that the defendants manufactured false oral and written statements accusing Sgt. Rybicki of improperly releasing “confidential” documents, with the malicious intent to incriminate her and mislead public officials performing official functions.

  • Tampering with Records (R.C. 2913.42(A)(1)): The complaint alleges that the defendants knowingly fabricated pretextual disciplinary and investigative documents to create a fraudulent record of wrongdoing by Sgt. Rybicki.

  • Failure to Report a Crime (R.C. 2921.22(A)(1)): The suit asserts that the defendants knew the command staff committed felony records tampering and felony retaliation, yet knowingly failed—as was their obligation—to report those felonies to outside law-enforcement authorities for independent investigation.

“An upside-down world.”

Subodh Chandra, lead counsel for Sgt. Rybicki, issued the following statement:

The complaint details an upside-down world where high-ranking public officials economically penalize and publicly humiliate a dedicated, pioneering public servant for helping expose corruption, while the police chief, who admitted to altering an arrest report, walks away unscathed. True law enforcement requires absolute integrity. By punishing Sgt. Rybicki and protecting a politically connected out-of-town deputy chief who chose to drive drunk with three loaded weapons, North Royalton leadership has shown contempt for the rule of law. The current mayor, Paul Marnacheck, has done nothing to correct course. We look forward to holding these officials accountable before a Cuyahoga County jury, including obtaining a substantial punitive-damages award from which the officials will never be relieved, even in bankruptcy.

Sgt. Rybicki is represented by Subodh Chandra and Emily Bohatch. The case is captioned FloAnn Rybicki v. Lawrence Antoskiewicz, et al., Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CV 26-141800, and is assigned to Judge Timothy McCormick. The civil complaint alleging criminal acts may be found here.

About The Chandra Law Firm LLC

The Chandra Law Firm LLC is a boutique firm based in Cleveland, Ohio, dedicated to vindicating the rights of whistleblowers and victims of civil-rights violations. The firm is known for its advocacy in high-stakes litigation against government and corporate misconduct.

Chandra Law is experienced obtaining justice for victims of employment retaliation. We also secure constitutional rights.

And the firm helped pioneer work in holding individuals and companies accountable for civil liability for criminal acts, securing the two leading Supreme Court of Ohio decisions favorable to crime victims on the topic.

If, after studying our practices pages, you think that your rights have been violated, you may contact us to discuss your options. Be sure to provide all the requested information.


At Chandra Law, your case is our cause®.

Related Practice Areas
Employment RetaliationCrime Victims: Civil Action for Damages for Criminal Acts Under Ohio Revised Code § 2307.60
Tags
civil-liability-for-criminal-actsretaliationemployment-retaliationintimidation

Making the right choice in legal representation can make the difference in whether you achieve a result that protects your legal rights and best interests.

Tell Us About Your Case