Civil Rights & Constitutional Law
Chandra Law obtains $2,000,750 jury verdict for former police chief LaMont Lockhart against the...
December 15, 2008
Monday, July 13, 2026

North Royalton Mayor Paul Marnecheck: now a defendant for participating in alleged retaliation against whistleblowing Officer Spencer Lowe. (City Hall portrait.)
NORTH ROYALTON, OH – Today, North Royalton Police Officer Spencer Lowe filed an amended and supplemental civil-rights complaint in his federal lawsuit, adding current acting-Mayor and Safety-Service Director Paul Marnecheck as a defendant. The lawsuit alleges that rather than reverse the unlawful, retaliatory actions of his predecessor, Marnecheck chose to extend and amplify the city’s retaliation campaign.
The amended complaint alleges that on May 15, 2026, Marnecheck converted Officer Lowe’s unlawful termination into a 60-day unpaid suspension. In a letter, Marnecheck maintained that Lowe violated department policies by sharing with the city's mayor/safety-service director and his union representative, attorney Brian Smith, public records showing corrupt decisionmaking and cover-up. The lawsuit alleges that Marnecheck’s imposition of a suspension constitutes a new, independent act of retaliation designed to lock in the economic penalties against the reporting officer and continue the city's extensive cover-up.
By transforming the firing into an unpaid suspension, Marnecheck allegedly blocked Officer Lowe from collecting unemployment benefits to support his family. Also, because North Royalton had already paid out Lowe’s accrued vacation and sick time upon his firing, the city stripped him of all accrued leave days upon reinstatement without providing any option to repay the funds.
The original lawsuit arose after Officer Lowe pulled over intoxicated Orange Village Deputy Police Chief Patrick O’Callahan on October 11, 2025. O’Callahan drove swerving and speeding with three loaded, accessible firearms in his vehicle. Officer Lowe arrested O’Callahan and charged him with operating a vehicle while impaired (OVI) and felony improper handling of a firearm. A court has since convicted him for OVI.
The lawsuit alleges that on October 14, 2025, Police Chief Keith Tarase and Lieutenant James Cutler accessed the electronic-records system and deleted from Lowe's approved report the felony-firearm charge, to shield the deputy chief from criminal exposure. After Officer Lowe discovered the alteration and reported the suspected felonies, former Mayor Lawrence Antoskiewicz launched a pretextual internal investigation and fired him on April 14, 2026, according to the amended complaint.

North Royalton Police Chief Keith Tarase and former Mayor Larry Antoskiewicz
The amended and supplemental complaint details several new facts and ongoing hostile actions uncovered since the original filing:
Subodh Chandra, lead counsel for Officer Lowe, issued the following statement:
Acting Mayor Paul Marnecheck had an opportunity to clean house, restore the rule of law, and fully vindicate a courageous officer who refused to participate in an alleged felony cover-up. Instead, Marnecheck chose to double down on the alleged corruption. By converting an unlawful firing into an economically devastating 60-day unpaid suspension and allowing the city to deny Officer Lowe basic law-enforcement tools, Marnecheck actively joined the conspiracy and became an accessory to it. North Royalton's leadership continues to show that it will stop at nothing to protect politically connected wrongdoers, while punishing the honest officers who expose them.
Lowe is represented by Subodh Chandra and Emily Bohatch.
Officer Lowe’s amended complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Case No. 1:26-CV-01371-PAG, is assigned to Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. It can be read here.
The civil complaint follows a May 6, 2026 Ohio Whistleblower Protection Act appeal of Lowe's firing to the State Personnel Board of Review.
Meanwhile, yet another victim, police Sergeant FloAnn Rybicki, filed a related retaliation complaint arising from the same circumstances.
At Chandra Law, your case is our cause.®
The Chandra Law Firm LLC is solely responsible for the content of this website.
©2026 The Chandra Law Firm LLC.