Civil Rights & Constitutional Law
Chandra Law obtains $2,000,750 jury verdict for former police chief LaMont Lockhart against the...
December 15, 2008
Wednesday, December 10, 2025

Randy Kertesz v. Dr. Rajesh Pidikiti defamation case: Kertesz lost and Dr. Pidikiti's free-speech rights were protected. (Photo used under fair use.)
CLEVELAND, OH—Today, in a historic and significant victory for free speech and public participation, the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas dismissed a purported defamation lawsuit filed by developer Randy Kertesz (pronounced “CURTIS”) against Orange Village resident Dr. Rajesh Pidikiti (pronounced rah-JAYSH pih-DIH-kit-tee).
The court granted Dr. Pidikiti’s Motion for Expedited Relief under Ohio’s newly enacted Uniform Public Expression Protection Act (UPEPA), effectively stopping what is known as a SLAPP suit (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation). It is believed to be the first such decision under the new statute in Cuyahoga County and among the first in Ohio.
The court dismissed the case with prejudice, meaning it can never be refiled. As the new statute mandates, Kertesz must now pay Dr. Pidikiti’s reasonable attorney fees, court costs, and expenses.
The dispute arose after Dr. Pidikiti spoke during the public-comment portion of an October 2024 Orange Village Council meeting to oppose a new phase of a Kertesz-backed development. Dr. Pidikiti expressed concerns about the development's impact on residents and described feeling harassed by Kertesz, who then served as president of the Homeowners’ Association (HOA). Dr. Pidikiti later spoke to the Cleveland Jewish News, allegedly expressing an opinion that he felt that Kertesz was a racist and noting that Kertesz had threatened lawsuits.
In August 2025, Kertesz sued Dr. Pidikiti for defamation.
The Chandra Law Firm LLC swiftly moved for expedited dismissal under UPEPA (R.C. 2747.01 et seq.), a law that went into effect on April 9, 2025 and is designed to protect individuals from meritless lawsuits intended to chill free speech.
In a December 10, 2025 opinion, Visiting Judge William T. McGinty, sitting for Judge Deborah Turner, found that Dr. Pidikiti’s speech was protected and made several critical findings strengthening Ohio’s free-speech protections:
Subodh Chandra, Dr. Pidikiti’s lead counsel, issued the following statement:
This historic ruling is a triumph for every Ohioan who wishes to speak truth to power without fear of financial ruin. Mr. Kertesz tried to use the legal system to silence a resident who dared to speak out at a city council meeting and to the media about a matter of public concern. Ohio’s new UPEPA statute worked exactly as intended: it exposed this lawsuit as meritless, shut it down quickly, and shifted the financial burden back to the (in our opinion) bully who filed it. We are thrilled for Dr. Pidikiti, who stood his ground to protect his First Amendment rights—including his right to express his opinion about racism.
“This is a great start. We can’t wait to shut down more efforts to quash free speech,” Chandra’s colleague Emily Bohatch, a former journalist, added. “People shouldn’t be filing meritless lawsuits attacking free-speech rights every time they have their feelings hurt over others expressing opinions about their behavior.”
“This is an example of the Streisand effect,” Chandra concluded. “If Kertesz had simply accepted Dr. Piditiki’s free-speech rights to express his opinion, Kertesz wouldn’t have generated a historic legal ruling that draws even more attention to Dr. Pidikiti’s allegedly expressed opinion about alleged racism.”
The term “Streisand effect” refers to the controversy generated when the actress and singer Barbara Streisand opposed publication of aerial photos of her Malibu estate. It refers to the phenomenon that occurs when someone tries to hide or suppress information, but doing so ends up drawing far more public attention. Efforts to muzzle critics, force content removal, or threaten lawsuits can unintentionally amplify the very thing someone wants to bury. Such efforts often backfire in the digital age.
Chandra Law will now seek to recover from Kertesz Dr. Pidikiti’s attorney fees and costs.
The legal team for Dr. Pidikiti includes Subodh Chandra, Alex Lavelle, and Emily Bohatch of The Chandra Law Firm LLC.
The case is captioned Kertesz v. Pidikiti, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CV-25-122630. Kertesz was represented by attorney Brian Green.
At Chandra Law, your case is our cause®.
The Chandra Law Firm LLC is solely responsible for the content of this website.
©2026 The Chandra Law Firm LLC.